Skip to content

Research · Frameworks & Benchmarks

Frameworks & Benchmarks

These are not twelve products. They are one architecture — the Lapis Stack — and the named parts that make it run.

Frameworks & Benchmarks is the firm's published body of method and measurement: the Lapis Stack — the architecture that binds every capability — and the protocols, methodologies, benchmarks, indices, and standards that operate within it. Each is named, specified, and held to the firm's evidentiary standard. Together they are how an institution does, in a discipline, what individuals cannot.

The Binding Architecture

The Lapis Stack is the architecture. Everything below operates inside it.

A firm has a toolkit; an institution has an architecture. The Lapis Stack is that architecture — the single, layered structure that binds the firm's capabilities into one system rather than a collection of services. It has four layers: a Linguistic Foundation of the 24 languages and their dialect bands; the Methods that turn that foundation into work; the Measures that quantify whether the work holds; and the Validation that signs off on it. Every framework on this page belongs to one of those layers.

I · Linguistic Foundation — the 24 languages and dialect bands the system rests on.
II · Methods — how the foundation becomes work.
III · Measures — how the work is quantified and held to a standard.
IV · Validation — how the work is reviewed and signed off.
Read the full architecture →
Abstract institutional motif: points of light resolving into a connected pattern.Complexity, orchestrated — capabilities resolving into one governed architecture.

The Principle

One architecture. Named in its parts.

The Lapis Stack binds the firm's capabilities; the frameworks below are how each layer is made real — and held to account.

The Frameworks

Twelve named frameworks, placed where they live.

Layer II · Methods

How the foundation becomes work.
Methodology

The ADF Pipeline

Standard methodology for multilingual annotation and reference-set production.

Read →
Pathway

The APAP Pathway

Afghan Patient Access Pathways framework for care navigation.

Read →
Standard

The Diaspora Trial Inclusion Standard

IRB/OHRP-compliant standard for Afghan diaspora clinical research.

Read →

Layer III · Measures

How the work is quantified and held to a standard.
Index

The Pashto-Dari Parity Index

Annual benchmark measuring linguistic parity in Afghan-language AI.

Read →
Index

The Sovereign Speech Index

Multilingual speech AI benchmark across Afghan languages and dialects.

Read →
Score

The Court Interpreter Readiness Score

Standardized score for court-qualified interpreter deployment.

Read →
Index

The Resettlement Integration Index

Longitudinal standard for measuring Afghan resettlement outcomes.

Read →
Map

The Section 1557 Conformance Map

45 C.F.R. § 92 readiness assessment for healthcare institutions.

Read →

Layer IV · Validation

How the work is reviewed and signed off.
Protocol

The Five-Gate Validation Protocol

Five-stage quality assurance from ingestion through delivery.

Read →
MarkIn development

The CCB Sign-Off Mark

Cultural compliance certification issued by the Cultural Compliance Bureau.

In development →
Methodology

The Cultural Hallucination Audit

CCB-validated methodology for detecting culturally inaccurate AI outputs.

Read →

Layer I — the Linguistic Foundation of 24 languages and their dialect bands — is the base the whole architecture rests on; it is detailed on the Lapis Stack and the Afghan Language Stack, not catalogued here as a separate instrument.

Using Them

Named so they can be cited; specified so they can be checked.

Each framework here is a published part of how the firm works, not a marketing label. The methodologies and protocols are documented; the benchmarks and indices have defined methods and report by dialect band; the standards map to recognized external requirements.

Where a framework's methodology is set out at length, it appears as a White Paper; where it governs the firm's operations, its full treatment lives in the Operating Model. This page is the index to all of it — the single place the architecture and its parts can be seen together.

One body of work, seen together.

The architecture and its twelve named parts, in one place.

Cite the framework.

Each is named and specified; the methodology behind it is documented where it lives.

Adopt or assess against it.

Frameworks and standards an institution can be measured against, or adopt — routed through the firm.

24

Afghan languages & dialect bands

0

security incidents

100%

senior-led engagements

41+

Trust Center documents

Layered institutional gradient field.

Complexity, Orchestrated

Data resolving into a governed pattern.

The same architecture that orders the firm's work orders this page — foundation, method, measure, validation.

Continue

Explore Research.

Research

Governance & Policy

Briefs, the regulatory watch, papers, and founder letters.

Explore →
Research

Evidence & Outcomes

The measured results these frameworks produce.

Explore →
Research

News & Events

Newsroom, events, and thought leadership.

Explore →

← The full operating architecture lives in the Operating Model.

See the architecture, and its parts.

For researchers, standards bodies, and institutions that want the firm's method and measurement as a body of work — named, specified, and open to scrutiny. Briefings are conducted under NDA, in Washington, D.C. or virtually.

Request a briefing